Evaluation of Upper Extremity Reachable Workspace in Children With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

PURPOSE: Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) results in upper extremity (UE) movement limitations. Current assessments of UE function used to inform clinical decision-making only evaluate a limited set of static postures and/or movements and have been criticized for being insensitive to certain meaningful differences in function. Reachable workspace provides a numeric and visual assessment of global UE movement ability by quantifying the regions in space that patients can reach with their hands, and it can be collected using real-time feedback to elicit a best-effort acquisition of function. This study evaluated the ability of a real-time feedback reachable workspace tool to assess UE movement in BPBI. METHODS: Twenty-two children with BPBI participated. Reachable workspace data were collected with three-dimensional motion capture using real-time visual feedback to measure UE reaching ability in all regions surrounding the body. All outer, far-from-body points reached by the hand were recorded and analyzed by region. A two-way, within-subjects analysis of variance was used to assess interlimb differences in percentage workspace reached and median reach distance for each of the six regions. RESULTS: The affected limb had significantly less percentage workspace reached than the unaffected limb for all six regions (mean interlimb differences by region, 5.7%-38.6%). The affected limb had significantly less median reach distance than the unaffected limb for all six regions (mean interlimb differences by region, 3.1%-36.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The workspace approach was capable of detecting UE movement impairments of the BPBI-affected limb. The reported deficits in workspace on the affected limb correspond to common movement impairments in BPBI, such as limitations in shoulder elevation, external rotation, extension, and elbow extension. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The real-time feedback reachable workspace tool is sufficiently robust for assessing UE movement impairments in children with BPBI.

The Philadelphia Shriners Hospital Approach to Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

The care of children with brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) is a complex multidisciplinary endeavor. At the Shriners Hospital for Children in Philadelphia, we have sought to elevate the quality of care delivered to patients through outcomes research and collaboration with colleagues around the world. Our approach to the management of this challenging pathology has evolved time and again. Here, we describe our current approach to patient assessment and operative management in patients with BPBI and its many sequelae.

Capacity Assessment Tool to Promote Capacity Building in Global Orthopaedic Surgical Outreach.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of nongovernmental organizations from high-income countries aim to provide surgical outreach for patients in low- and middle-income countries in a manner that builds capacity. There remains, however, a paucity of measurable steps to benchmark and evaluate capacity-building efforts. Based on a framework for capacity building, the present study aimed to develop a Capacity Assessment Tool for orthopaedic surgery (CAT-os) that could be utilized to evaluate and promote capacity building. METHODS: To develop the CAT-os tool, we utilized methodological triangulation-an approach that incorporates multiple different types of data. We utilized (1) the results of a systematic review of capacity-building best practices in surgical outreach, (2) the HEALTHQUAL National Organizational Assessment Tool, and (3) 20 semistructured interviews to develop a draft of the CAT-os. We subsequently iteratively used a modified nominal group technique with a consortium of 8 globally experienced surgeons to build consensus, which was followed by validation through member-checking. RESULTS: The CAT-os was developed and validated as a formal instrument with actionable steps in each of 7 domains of capacity building. Each domain includes items that are scaled for scoring. For example, in the domain of partnership, items range from no formalized plans for sustainable, bidirectional relationships (no capacity) to local surgeons and other health-care workers independently participating in annual meetings of surgical professional societies and independently creating partnership with third party organizations (optimal capacity). CONCLUSIONS: The CAT-os details steps to assess capacity of a local facility, guide capacity-improvement efforts during surgical outreach, and measure the impact of capacity-building efforts. Capacity building is a frequently cited and commendable approach to surgical outreach, and this tool provides objective measurement to aid in improving the capacity in low and middle-income countries through surgical outreach.

Current Concepts in Elbow Extension Reconstruction for the Tetraplegic Patient.

Individuals with C5 or C6 spinal cord injury (SCI) have paralysis of the triceps brachii, and the subsequent loss of elbow extension makes it impossible to reliably use their hands above shoulder level because of the inability to hold the elbow extended against gravity. For persons with cervical SCI, elbow extension can be restored with both tendon and nerve transfers. Elbow extension is necessary for dressing, eating, wheelchair locomotion, pressure relief maneuvers, independent transfers, and reaching objects above shoulder level. Deltoid-to-triceps and biceps-to-triceps tendon transfers have established efficacy and a longer history of use. Transfer of motor branches from the axillary nerve to triceps motor branches is new with no current published prospective studies but shows early promise. This review aims to highlight the amazing potential these procedures can have on the independence and quality of life for people with quadriplegia. Despite the immense benefit possible, fewer than 14% of eligible people with cervical SCI in the United States receive upper limb reconstructive surgery. Surgical timing is critical. A broader understanding and raised awareness of reconstructive options for elbow extension in people with quadriplegia will increase recognition of eligible patients and speed referral time to the appropriate practitioner.

Early Results of 3-Dimensional Planning and Customized Cutting Guides for the Treatment of Severe Madelung Defofrmity.

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of Madelung deformity can present challenges due to a need for multiplanar correction. Developing customized cutting guides for osteotomies may improve surgical outcomes by enhancing the surgeon's understanding and surgical correction. METHODS: All patients who underwent forearm osteotomies for Madelung deformity using computed tomography planning with 3-dimensional-printed customized cutting guides were retrospectively reviewed (n = 8). Seven patients underwent a double osteotomy of the radius, and 1 underwent a single osteotomy. RESULTS: Ulnar tilt was improved in all cases. Correction of deformity was significant on anteroposterior but not on lateral views. The mean preoperative and postoperative radial bow was measured in 2 planes, with an average preoperative bow of 32° (± 21°) on anteroposterior radiographs and 36° (± 17°) on lateral radiographs, and an average bow of 10° (± 6°) on anteroposterior radiographs and 7° (± 6°) on lateral films after surgery. The predicted radial bow was calculated to be 9.1° (± 8°). CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional planning allows predictable deformity correction across multiple but not all parameters. Future studies comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes of guided versus nonguided osteotomies are required to justify the additional expense and preoperative planning efforts. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

A Framework and Blueprint for Building Capacity in Global Orthopaedic Surgical Outreach.

BACKGROUND: Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) from high-income countries provide surgical outreach for patients in low and middle-income countries (LMICs); however, these efforts lack a coordinated measurement of their ability to build capacity. While the World Health Organization and others recommend outreach trips that aim to build the capacity of the local health-care system, no guidance exists on how to accomplish this. The objective of this paper is to establish a framework and a blueprint to guide the operations of NGOs that provide outreach to build orthopaedic surgical capacity in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with 16 orthopaedic surgeons and administrators located in 7 countries (6 LMICs) on the necessary domains for capacity-building; the analysis was guided by a literature review of capacity-building frameworks. We subsequently conducted a modified nominal group technique with a consortium of 10 U.S.-based surgeons with expertise in global surgical outreach, which was member-checked with 8 new stakeholders from 4 LMICs. RESULTS: A framework with 7 domains for capacity-building in global surgical outreach was identified. The domains included professional development, finance, partnerships, governance, community impact, culture, and coordination. These domains were tiered in a hierarchical system to stratify the level of capacity for each domain. A blueprint was developed to guide the operations of an organization seeking to build capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The developed framework identified 7 domains to address when building capacity during global orthopaedic surgical outreach. The framework and its tiered system can be used to assess capacity and guide capacity-building efforts in LMICs. The developed blueprint can inform the operations of NGOs toward activities that focus on building capacity in order to ensure a measured and sustained impact.

Assessment of approaches to estimate scapular orientation in children with brachial plexus birth injury.

BACKGROUND: Challenges in measuring dynamic scapular orientation limit assessment of scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to shoulder function in children with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). Double calibration acromion marker cluster (D-AMC) and linear model approaches have been validated to estimate scapular motion in healthy adults, but neither has been evaluated in BPBI. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the linear model and D-AMC approaches able to accurately estimate scapular orientation in children with BPBI at functional arm postures? METHODS: Seventeen children with BPBI positioned their affected limbs in 11 static positions while their segment orientations were measured with motion capture. Linear model and D-AMC estimates of scapular orientation were compared against palpation at six of the static positions with functional relevance to BPBI using a three-way repeat measures ANOVA and a comparison of root mean square errors (RMSE) against literature AMC values for healthy adults. RESULTS: The D-AMC was similar to palpation across all positions and scapular axes while the linear model differed from palpation in a few instances. RMSEs of the D-AMC (3.7-14.8°) and particularly the linear model (4.6-24.8°) were generally at or beyond the upper range of past AMC analyses on healthy adults (1.6-14.2°), especially for more complex, multiplanar arm postures. Despite the D-AMC outperforming the linear model, this approach still produced clinically meaningful (>10°) errors for roughly (12.7-22.5%) of subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Current methods for estimating dynamic scapular orientation remain less than ideal for BPBI. Use of the D-AMC may be appropriate to gain broad insights into general dynamic scapulothoracic and glenohumeral function; however, given their potential for producing clinically meaningful errors, the D-AMC and linear model are not recommended for diagnostic purposes or outcomes assessment on an individual patient basis unless their patient-specific accuracy has been evaluated and confirmed prior to use.

Comparison of Shoulder Motion Measurements by Visual Estimate, Goniometer and Motion Capture.

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) can result in lasting impairments of external rotation and cross-body adduction (CBA) that disrupt functional activities such as dressing, grooming, or throwing a ball. The purpose of this study was to compare the quantification of shoulder humerothoracic (HT) external rotation (ER), and glenohumeral (GH) CBA by 3 methods - physician visual estimate, goniometer measurement by an occupational therapist, and motion capture. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with BPBI (average age of 9.9±3.2 y) participated in this study. Mallet scores and visual estimates of passive HT ER and GH CBA were recorded by a physician. The passive measures were repeated by an occupational therapist using a goniometer while motion capture measures were simultaneously collected. Active HT ER was also measured by motion capture. The passive measures were compared with analyses of variance with repeated measures, intraclass correlations, and Bland-Altman plots. External rotation Mallet scores determined by motion capture and by the physician were compared. RESULTS: The measures of GH CBA were not statistically different and demonstrated good agreement, but substantial variation. For HT ER, all measures were significantly different and demonstrated poor agreement and substantial variation. When the joint angles measured by motion capture were used to determine the Mallet score, 79% of external rotation Mallet scores assigned by the physician were incorrectly categorized, with the physician always scoring the participant higher than predicted motion capture Mallet score. CONCLUSIONS: Both GH CBA and HT ER measures demonstrated substantial variability between measurement types, but only HT ER joint angles were significantly different. In addition, more than three-quarters of external rotation Mallet scores were misclassified by the physician. Motion capture measurements offer the benefit of less susceptibility to patients' compensatory and/or out-of-plane movements and should be considered for clinical assessment of shoulder range of motion in children with BPBI. If motion capture is unavailable, the use of a goniometer provides more accurate clinical measures of shoulder motion than visual estimates and care should be taken to minimize and account for compensatory movement strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case series.

Reachable workspace with real-time motion capture feedback to quantify upper extremity function: A study on children with brachial plexus birth injury.

Clinical upper extremity (UE) functional assessments and motion capture measures are limited to a set of postures and/or motions that may provide an incomplete evaluation of UE functionality. Reachable workspace analysis offers a more global assessment of UE function, but is reliant on patient compliance with instructions and may result in underestimates of a patient's true UE function. This study evaluated a clinical tool that incorporates real-time visual feedback with motion capture to provide an innovative means of engaging patients to ensure a 'best effort' quantification of their available UE workspace. Reachable workspace for 10 children with brachial plexus birth injury was collected with and without real-time feedback on the affected and unaffected limbs. Real-time feedback consisted of subjects reaching for virtual targets surrounding their physical space using a virtual cursor controlled by the real-time location of their hand. Real-time feedback resulted in significantly greater workspace in multiple regions on both the affected (3/6 octants; mean differences 10.8%-20.0%) and unaffected (6/6 octants; mean differences 24.3%-40.0%) limbs. Use of real-time feedback also yielded significant interlimb differences in workspace across more regions (4/6 octants; mean differences 29.0%-39.9% vs. 1/6 octants; mean difference 17%). Finally, real-time feedback resulted in significant interlimb differences in median reach distance across more regions (4/6 octants; mean differences 7.5%-44.8% vs. 1/6 octants; mean difference 11.2%). A reachable workspace tool with real-time feedback results in more workspace and UE function recorded and offers a highly visual and intuitive depiction of a patient's UE abilities.

The One-Bone Forearm in Children: Surgical Technique and a Retrospective Review of Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe a technique of end-to-end rigid fixation of the distal radius to the proximal ulna. The shortening and radioulnar overlap in this technique yield a high union rate, large corrections, and few complications. METHODS: This retrospective chart review from 2 centers was undertaken in 39 patients (40 forearms) who underwent one-bone forearm operations between 2005 and 2019. There were 25 male and 14 female patients, with a mean age at surgery of 9.7 years (range 3 to 19 years; SD, 4.5 years). The diagnoses included brachial plexus birth injury, spinal cord injury, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, cerebral palsy, ulnar deficiency with focal indentation, multiple hereditary exostosis, acute flaccid myelitis, and tumor. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 33.5 months (1.2-110.1 months; SD, 27.1 months). The 36 forearms in supination had an average supination contracture of 93° (range, 15° to 120°; SD, 15.4°). The 4 pronated arms had an average pronation contracture of 80° (range, 50° to 120°; SD, 29.2°). The average postoperative position was 22.8° of pronation (range, -15° to 45°; SD, 12.9°). The average correction obtained with our technique was 113° (range, 20° to 145°; SD, 22.9°). Radiographic union was demonstrated in 32 (80%) of the one-bone forearms by 10 weeks, 39 (97.5%) by 16 weeks, and 40 (100%) by 24 weeks. One patient had peri-implant fractures prior to union. No forearms required reoperation for nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: One-bone forearm performed with this technique allows reliable healing and a large degree of correction. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Single Versus Double Tendon Transfer to Improve Shoulder External Rotation During the Treatment of Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy.

Background: Tendon transfers are commonly performed in patients with brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) to improve function. Transferring 2 tendons in patients with C5-7 injury has the potential complication of loss of midline function. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a single tendon transfer (1TT) as opposed to the traditional double tendon transfer (2TT) resulted in any differences in functional outcomes in patients with C5-7 BPBP. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with C5-7 BPBP who underwent tendon transfers to improve shoulder external rotation over a 5-year period was performed at 2 institutions. Outcomes were assessed using the modified Mallet (MM) classification scores. Results: Twenty-two C5-7 patients had complete records of preoperative and postoperative MM scores, including 11 sex-matched patients in both the 1TT and 2TT groups. When comparing preoperative and postoperative MM categories, there were significant improvements in both the 1TT and 2TT groups for global abduction (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively) and external rotation (P < .00001 for both). Modified Mallet (MM) hand to neck scores were significantly improved in the 2TT group (P < .05) but not in the 1TT group (P = .053). Internal rotation scores significantly decreased in both groups (P < .001). Both groups demonstrated significant increases in total scores from the preoperative MM scores (P < .01). Conclusion: The 1TT and 2TT procedures result in substantial gains in upper extremity functions for patients with C5-7 BPBP as measured by the MM score, specifically within the global abduction and external rotation subcategories. However, a significant loss occurs in internal rotation for both groups.

Assessment of the relationship between Brachial Plexus Profile activity short form scores and modified Mallet scores.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the relationship between the modified Mallet classification and the Brachial Plexus Profile activity short form (BP-PRO activity SF). The therapist or surgeon classifies upper extremity movement for the modified Mallet classification, while the BP-PRO assesses parents' perceptions of difficulty performing activities. PURPOSE: To provide a deeper understanding of the relationship of functional and perceived outcome measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, correlational design. METHODS: Eighty children with brachial plexus birth injuries were evaluated using the modified Mallet classification, while parents simultaneously answered the BP-PRO activity SF questions. All patients had undergone one of three surgical interventions to improve shoulder function. The relationship between the two measures, patient injury levels, and surgical histories were assessed. RESULTS: The average modified Mallet scores and BP-PRO activity SF scores weakly correlated (r = 0.312, P = .005) and both measures differentiated between C5-6 and C5-7 injury levels (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively). Conversely, the modified Mallet scores could differentiate between the three surgical groups (F = 8.2, P < .001), while the BP-PRO activity SF could not (P = .54). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that these tools measure different aspects of patient outcomes. The Mallet classification may be more focused on shoulder motion than the BP-PRO activity SF. Additional questions that specifically require shoulder function could be incorporated into the BP-PRO activity SF to improve understanding of patient/parent perceptions of shoulder function for children with brachial plexus injuries. Clinicians should be aware of the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of each outcome assessment tool for appropriate use and interpretation of results.

Nerve Transfers for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Patients With Acute Flaccid Myelitis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate short- to midterm outcomes of patients with acute flaccid myelitis who underwent nerve transfers for restoration of elbow flexion. METHODS: Patients with a minimum of 10 months of follow up after undergoing nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion were clinically assessed using the Active Movement Scale (AMS). They were evaluated for any postoperative complications, particularly weakness in the distribution of the donor nerve(s). Fifteen of 25 consecutive patients who were treated using this surgical technique were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: All patients exhibited poor elbow flexion preoperatively (AMS 0 to 3). At a mean follow up of 17.3 months, 80% (15/25) of patients achieved excellent elbow flexion (AMS 6 or 7); 9 of these 15 had full active range of motion. Two patients achieved good elbow flexion (AMS 5) with antigravity movement to less than 50% of the passive range of motion. No cases of superficial or deep infection were reported, and all patients maintained identical motor function, relative to preoperative status, of the muscles innervated by the donor nerves. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve transfer surgery has shown promising short- to midterm results for recovery of nerve and muscle function, particularly for the restoration of elbow flexion. We recommend this treatment option for patients not demonstrating clinical improvement after 6 to 9 months of incomplete recovery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Scapulothoracic and Glenohumeral Contributions to Humerothoracic Kinematics in Single Versus Double Tendon Transfers in Patients With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that patients with brachial plexus birth injury are more likely to retain midline function following a teres major tendon transfer without a concomitant latissimus dorsi transfer. Both procedures increase shoulder external rotation and abduction, but whether increased loss of midline frequency following double transfer is due to glenohumeral (GH) joint motion or scapulothoracic (ST) compensation is unknown. We hypothesized that double tendon transfers would exhibit greater GH external rotation than single tendon transfers, thus requiring greater ST rotation to internally rotate the shoulder, while GH and ST contributions to elevation remained equivalent between both groups. METHODS: Twenty-six postsurgical children with C5/C6 brachial plexus birth injuries participated in this study. Thirteen patients with single tendon transfers were matched with 13 with double tendon transfer. Coordinate systems of the thorax, scapula, and humerus were measured utilizing motion capture in 6 arm positions. Joint angles were calculated by the helical (ST) and modified globe method (GH and humerothoracic [HT]). Differences between groups were compared with repeated measures of multivariate analyses of variance for each position. Pending significant multivariate analyses of variance, univariate analyses of variance determined joint differences between transfer groups. RESULTS: Joint rotations from neutral were similar between groups in 5 of 6 tested positions, with double tendon transfers consistently demonstrating 15°-20˚ more internal rotation at the GH and HT joints. Still, only the internal rotation position showed statistically significant differences in GH and HT joint angles. The ST joint angles were similar in this position (45.2˚ and 48.5˚). CONCLUSIONS: The arc of motion for patients with double tendon transfer was more internally rotated than in patients with single tendon transfer at the GH and HT joints for all positions. However, both groups demonstrated little active rotation from neutral. Based on this data, teres major-only tendon transfers may not reduce the risk of loss of midline function. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Fixation of Displaced Medial Epicondylar Fractures in Adolescents.

Fractures of the medial epicondyle are often a marker of injury of the medial collateral ligament complex of the elbow, regardless of displacement. The medial epicondyle serves as the origin for the flexor/pronator mass superficially and the medial collateral ligament near the base. These fractures occur most commonly through the apophysis at the base of the epicondyle, making differentiation of muscular versus ligamentous avulsion difficult. Fractures associated with elbow dislocation and fractures with an intra-articular incarcerated medial epicondyle are ligamentous injuries, requiring at least intraoperative examination and most likely fixation of the fracture. Degree of displacement has traditionally been considered the deciding factor for fracture fixation, but this concept has been proven unreliable both in the literature and in our experience. Regardless of the degree of displacement, we recommend examination under anesthesia for all displaced fractures, with fixation of any fractures that render the elbow unstable to valgus stress. DESCRIPTION: The patient is placed in the supine position, and an examination under anesthesia is performed. If the elbow is stable to valgus load, the patient is placed into a long arm cast and awakened from anesthesia. If the elbow is unstable, the patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position, and the arm is prepared and draped. The fingers and wrist are wrapped with a self-adhesive bandage in flexion to relax the flexor/pronator mass. Under tourniquet control, a curvilinear medial incision is made just dorsal to the medial epicondyle. The ulnar nerve is identified and transposed if necessary. A guidewire is placed through the fracture fragment and used as a joystick. The hand is then positioned on the posterior aspect of the hip to provide varus load to the elbow and assist with reduction. The medial epicondyle is reduced, and the guidewire is advanced unicortically. A 3.0-mm, partially threaded cannulated screw is then advanced over the guidewire. A long arm cast is applied after closure of the wound with buried absorbable sutures. ALTERNATIVES: Nonoperative treatment in a cast has been suggested. Surgical variations include supine positioning, bicortical screws, and use of washers. RATIONALE: Lateral decubitus positioning and wrapping of the hand and wrist in flexion facilitate reduction by both applying a varus load and relaxing the flexor/pronator mass. Unicortical fixation is sufficient and does not risk injury to anterolateral structures. Washers have a higher complication rate than screws alone and may not be necessary in most cases1.

Outcomes of Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation in Pediatric Patients With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Capitellum.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of osteochondral autograft transplantations in the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum in the pediatric population. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016, 15 patients who had undergone osteochondral autograft transplantation at a mean age of 13.7 years at surgery were identified. The donor site was from the superolateral, non-weight-bearing surface of the lateral femoral condyle of the ipsilateral knee. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 29.5 months, with no patients lost to follow-up. Mean arc of motion increased significantly from 121.9° preoperatively to 139.1° postoperatively. All 9 elite athletes returned to sports at an elite level: 7 returned to the same level of competition in the same sport, 1 retired from gymnastics due to multiple injuries but began diving at an elite level, and 1 retired from baseball unrelated to elbow symptoms but continued hockey at the same level. Of the 4 recreational athletes, all returned to sport. There were no intraoperative complications. The symptoms resolved completely in all but 2 patients, who improved over their preoperative condition. The donor site knee pain resolved in all patients at an average of 2.3 months. Postoperative imaging demonstrated the healing and incorporation of the plug in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum, osteochondral autograft transplantation demonstrates excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes, with minimal short-term donor site morbidity and a high level of return to the sport. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Effect of Glenohumeral Reduction Type Combined With Tendon Transfer for Brachial Plexus Injury on Objective, Functional, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Glenohumeral (GH) joint reductions are frequently performed during tendon transfer surgery for brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI); however, the effect of reduction method (none required, closed, surgical) has not been assessed. This study compared objective, functional, and patient-reported outcomes between children who underwent a tendon transfer and (1) did not require GH reduction, (2) required concomitant closed GH reduction, or (3) required concomitant surgical GH reduction. METHODS: Fifty-four children with BPBI who previously underwent teres major and/or latissimus dorsi transfer with or without concomitant GH reduction participated. Joint reduction method was classified as none required (n = 21), closed (n = 9), or surgical (n = 24). Motion capture was collected in a neutral position, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation. Glenohumeral joint angles and displacements were calculated. Joint angular displacements represented the differences between the joint angles in each terminal position and the joint angles of the arm at rest in the neutral position. A hand surgeon determined modified Mallet scores. Participants' parents completed the Brachial Plexus Profile Activity Short Form (BP-PRO-SF) to assess physical activity performance. RESULTS: The no-reduction group had significantly less GH elevation than the surgical-reduction group for all positions and significantly less GH elevation than the closed-reduction group for the neutral, external rotation, and internal rotation positions. There were no differences in GH rotation angles. Glenohumeral joint displacements from neutral and modified Mallet scores were similar. The no-reduction group demonstrated significantly greater BP-PRO-SF scores than the surgical-reduction group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent a closed or surgical GH joint reduction consistently displayed more GH elevation. Clinically, this corresponds to an abduction contracture. Whereas increased abduction contracture provided a benefit of greater overhead motion, modified Mallet scores were similar between groups. The surgical-reduction group demonstrated lower BP-PRO-SF outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Tendon Transfer for Wrist Extension.

Peripheral nerve injuries are among the most complex conditions facing upper-extremity surgeons. Loss of wrist extension can result in marked limitations, including loss of pinch and grip strength with discoordination of grasp and release. Tendon transfers represent the mainstay of operative treatment and have proven to be an effective method for restoring loss of wrist extension. The literature describes myriad techniques to restore loss of wrist extension. The best choice of transfers is dependent on what is available, depending on the level of injury. The present article describes a novel technique of transferring 2 flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendons for wrist extension for patients with radial nerve lesions. The technique involves direct transfer of the long and ring finger FDS tendons to the third metacarpal bone. One FDS is routed through the interosseous membrane while the second FDS tendon is routed radially around the wrist to prevent a net supination or pronation force. If needed, the tendons can be alternatively routed to augment either pronation or supination. Passing both FDS tendons through the interosseous membrane creates a supination moment of the forearm, whereas routing both around the radius adds pronation. This article will review the relevant anatomy, indications, contraindications, operative technique, postoperative management, and outcomes. DESCRIPTION: The present article describes the technique of transferring 2 FDS tendons to restore wrist extension in patients who have lost wrist extension secondary to nerve lesions, such as radial nerve palsy and brachial plexus injuries. This technique involves the transfer of the long and ring finger FDS tendons around the base of the long metacarpal. One FDS tendon is routed through the interosseous membrane, and the second FDS tendon is routed radially around the wrist to add a pronation moment to the transfer. ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives include nerve transfers and tendon transfers1-5, such as:pronator teres to extensor carpi radialis longus and extensor carpi radialis brevis,palmaris longus to flexor carpi radialis,flexor carpi ulnaris to extensor digitorum communis III-V3,flexor carpi radialis to extensor indicis proprius, extensor digitorum communis, and extensor pollicis longus. RATIONALE: The pronator teres tendon has been the primary donor described to restore wrist extension. However, this tendon is often inadequate and requires a periosteal extension. In addition, the pronator muscle may be involved in brachial plexus injures and unavailable as a donor. Lastly, the FDS is synergistic with wrist extension, which facilitates rehabilitation. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: Child and adult patients are expected to have good control of function at 3 months postoperatively, with a full recovery at 6 months postoperatively. Because the FDS is synergistic with wrist extension, rehabilitation is straightforward. The wrist is immobilized in a sugar-tong for 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively, followed by the use of a removable thermoplastic wrist brace for 4 weeks full-time, except when bathing and performing physical therapy, and then for 4 weeks at night only. Physical therapy should focus on activation and training of the FDS under therapist supervision. Supervised active extension exercises can be initiated after week 4 postoperatively, taking care to avoid wrist flexion beyond neutral and resistive exercises. Functional exercises can be initiated at 6 weeks postoperatively, with light resistance only until week 12, coinciding with the discontinued use of the wrist brace. IMPORTANT TIPS: Surgery is performed through 4 primary incisions:○ a volar oblique incision in the distal palmar crease at the base of the long and ring fingers,○ a volar transverse incision at the mid-forearm,○ a dorsal transverse incision over the midshaft of the third metacarpal,○ a dorsal forearm transverse incision opposite to the volar forearm incision to shuttle the FDS tendon.The FDS donor tendons to the long and ring fingers are isolated first.Any adhesions between the FDS and flexor digitorum profundus are divided.The FDS tendons are left in the wounds until later to prevent desiccation.On occasion, the FDS tendons can become caught in the carpal canal during harvesting and will need to be pulled back into the distal palmar incision for further lysis of connections between the FDS and flexor digitorum profundus tendons.A wide window, not a slit, is cut in the interosseous membrane to pass 1 of the FDS tendons.A counter incision in the dorsal forearm is made with use of a long, curved clamp through the interosseous membrane. A Penrose drain is then passed through this tendon portal.Our preferred site for the FDS tendon attachments is around the base of the long metacarpal. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS: FDS = flexor digitorum superficialisPT = pronator teresECRL = extensor carpi radialis longusECRB = extensor carpi radialis brevisFCU = flexor carpi ulnarisEDC = extensor digitorum communisFCR = flexor carpi radialisEIP = extensor indicis propriusEPL = extensor pollicis longusFDP = flexor digitorum profundusMC = metacarpal.

ASSH 75 Years: An Update of Progress Over the Past 25 Years.

This article chronicles some of the major advancements made by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand over the past 25 years since the publication of William Newmeyer III's monograph, American Society for Surgery of the Hand: The First Fifty Years, in 1995. What is intangible and impossible to articulate in this article are the countless stories of relationship building, education, and research advancement that the programming and activities the American Society for Surgery of the Hand has provided.

The Utilization of Nerve Transfer for Reestablishing Shoulder Function in the Setting of Acute Flaccid Myelitis: A Single-Institution Review.

BACKGROUND: Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a rare disease of young children. The typical presentation involves acute-onset flaccid paralysis in one or more extremities with a nonspecific viral prodrome. Long-term outcomes demonstrate that functional recovery plateaus around six to nine months. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of nerve transfers for restoring shoulder function in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with AFM at a single institution. Shoulder function was evaluated using the active movement scale (AMS). Children at a minimum of six months after diagnosis with plateaued shoulder AMS scores of 4 or less were indicated for surgery. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified with a mean time from symptom onset to surgery of 12 months. Average follow-up was 19 months. The mean AMS score at follow-up for shoulder external rotation and abduction was 4.6 and 2.8, respectively. A total of six different nerve transfers with five different donor nerves were used individually or in conjunction with each other. The most common transfers were from the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve (n = 8) and from the intercostal nerves ×3 to the axillary nerve (n = 5). Patients who received a transfer from the radial nerve to the axillary nerve (n = 2) had the best functional returns, with the mean AMS score of 6.5 in both external rotation and abduction at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Nerve transfer procedures may help restore shoulder function in the setting of AFM. Combination procedures that involve a transfer from the radial nerve to the axillary nerve may provide the best functional results.